Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

An intracellular, non-oxidative factor activates in vitro chromatin fragmentation in pig sperm

Abstract

Background

In vitro incubation of epididymal and vas deferens sperm with Mn2+ induces Sperm Chromatin Fragmentation (SCF), a mechanism that causes double-stranded breaks in toroid-linker regions (TLRs). Whether this mechanism, thought to require the participation of topoisomerases and/or DNAses and thus far only described in epididymal mouse sperm, can be triggered in ejaculated sperm is yet to be elucidated. The current study aimed to determine if exposure of pig ejaculated sperm to divalent ions (Mn2+ and Mg2+) activates SCF, and whether this has any impact on sperm function and survival. For this purpose, sperm DNA integrity was evaluated through the Comet assay and Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE); sperm motility and agglutination were assessed with computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA); and sperm viability and levels of total reactive oxygen species (ROS) and superoxides were determined through flow cytometry.

Results

Incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ activated SCF in a dose-dependent (P < 0.05) albeit not time-dependent manner (P > 0.05); in contrast, Mg2+/Ca2+ only triggered SCF at high concentrations (50 mM). The PFGE revealed that, when activated by Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+, SCF generated DNA fragments of 33–194 Kb, compatible with the size of one or multiple toroids. Besides, Mn2+/Ca2+ affected sperm motility in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05), whereas Mg2+/Ca2+ only impaired this variable at high concentrations (P < 0.05). While this effect on motility was concomitant with an increase of agglutination, neither viability nor ROS levels were affected by Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ treatments.

Conclusion

Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mn2+/Ca2+ were observed to induce SCF in ejaculated sperm, resulting in DNA cleavage at TLRs. The activation of this mechanism by an intracellular, non-oxidative factor sheds light on the events taking place during sperm cell death.

Background

Sperm DNA breaks are one of the most important chromatin alterations that underlie male infertility and contribute to pregnancy loss [1,2,3,4]. Since its inception, the study of sperm DNA fragmentation has focused on elucidating which mechanisms cause DNA breaks, as not only does this help understand how they may impact reproductive outcomes [5,6,7,8], but also addresses whether they may be prevented both in vivo and in vitro [9, 10].

Sperm cells reach a high degree of differentiation after spermiogenesis, a process during which chromatin undergoes extreme remodeling, replacing most of the histones by protamines [11,12,13]. This specific packaging of nuclear material leads to the formation of toroidal structures lengthening about 50 Kb [14], which are stabilized by intra- and inter-protamine interactions [15, 16]. The packaging of sperm DNA into toroids containing protamines provides a very high degree of condensation, thus protecting the paternal genome from genotoxic damage [17, 18]. According to the most accepted model for chromatin organization, toroids are linked with each other and to the nuclear matrix through Toroid Linker Regions (TLR), which are less condensed and contain histones instead of protamines [19,20,21]. A high incidence of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSB) in TLRs is associated to an increased risk of recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure [22], suggesting a vital function for the genes located in these regions during early embryo development. Furthermore, specific TLRs attached to the nuclear scaffold have been suggested to play a crucial role in the initiation of paternal DNA replication [23]. Moreover, previous research demonstrated that, in addition to the fact that TLRs are nuclease-sensitive [17, 24, 25], in vitro incubation of epididymal and vas deferens sperm with their own fluid supplemented with Mn2+/Ca2+ induces a mechanism known as Sperm Chromatin Fragmentation (SCF), which causes double-stranded DNA breaks in TLRs [20, 26]. Noticeably, the DSBs induced by the in vitro activation of SCF remain attached to the nuclear matrix, which suggests that such a binding could be part of a mechanism of the zygote to repair its DNA [25] and reinforces the importance of the biological function of TLRs. Regarding the molecular mechanism originating SCF in vitro, although it has been suggested to result from endogenous nuclease activation [19, 20], the possibility that a topoisomerase associated to the nuclear matrix causes these DSBs should not be excluded [25, 27, 28].

A recent study conducted in vasectomized mice demonstrated, for the first time, that SCF also exists as an in vivo mechanism contributing to natural sperm degradation after certain time of storage in the epididymis [29]. This mechanism would inactivate sperm chromatin and prevent defective sperm that have been stored for a long period in the epididymis from being functional. While that study supported that SCF can be activated in epididymal and vas deferens mouse sperm, whether ejaculated sperm also have the ability to trigger this process is yet to be investigated. Remarkably, this would provide a broader picture about how DNA damage occurs in mature sperm as, whereas most DNA breaks are thought to result from oxidative stress [30, 31], those induced by SCF would certainly be produced by a separate mechanism. In the light of the aforementioned, the present work aimed to: (a) determine if the SCF mechanism is also active in ejaculated sperm, using the pig as an animal model; (b) interrogate if Mg2+ ions can elicit the mechanism, in a similar fashion to Mn2+; and (c) address if the activation of this DNA-fragmentation mechanism entails other consequences for sperm function and survival.

Results

Sperm DNA breaks can be induced in ejaculated sperm through intracellular divalent ions

The first experiment aimed to assess if DNA breaks can be induced in ejaculated sperm in vitro and, if so, if this relies upon intracellular or extracellular factors. For this purpose, permeabilized and non-permeabilized samples were incubated with different concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ for different incubation times.

Dose–response results for Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ treatments are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1. On the one hand, Mn2+/Ca2+ exerted a dose-dependent effect on the generation of DNA breaks, in both permeabilized and non-permeabilized samples. In the latter, there were significant differences between Mn2+/Ca2+ treatments (P < 0.05), except between the two highest concentrations (Fig. 1A). In contrast, incubation with Mg2+/Ca2+ showed no dose-dependent effect, and an increased incidence of DNA breaks was only detected when comparing incubations with the highest Mg2+/Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 1B). Specifically, statistical differences were only observed between the control and 5 mM Mg2+/Ca2+ (P = 0.010), and between 50 mM Mg2+/Ca2+ and all the other treatments (P < 0.05), in both non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized samples (+TX) (P < 0.05). As no significant differences between permeabilized and non-permeabilized samples were found after incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2), it seemed that an intracellular component triggered the SCF mechanism and thus generated DNA breaks.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comet assay Olive Tail Moment (OTM) after incubation of sperm with different concentrations (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM and 50 mM) of Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) in non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+ TX) samples. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) within non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples. Comparisons between non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples, or between ions (Mn2+/Ca2+ vs. Mg2+/Ca2+) are not depicted

Table 1 Olive Tail Moment (OTM) after incubation with different concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM and 50 mM) in non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comet assay Olive Tail Moment (OTM) after incubation of sperm with different concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM and 50 mM), in non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples. (*) indicates significant differences between non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples (P ≤ 0.05)

On the other hand, and as shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2, there was no effect of incubation time on the activation of the SCF mechanism, regardless of whether samples were permeabilized or non-permeabilized. In effect, incubation with 5 mM Mn2+/Ca2+ for different times (2 min, 10 min, 30 min and 60 min) led to similar DNA damage (P > 0.05), which was greater than in the control (P > 0.05). In the case of Mg2+, only the longest incubation (60 min) with Mg2+/Ca2+ appeared to evoke SCF, as solely this period was significantly different from the others (2 min, 10 min and 30 min) and from the control (P < 0.05). In short, while the effect of incubation time did not differ between permeabilized and non-permeabilized sperm in Mn2+/Ca2+ treatments, the extent of DNA damage was greater in permeabilized than in non-permeabilized samples after incubation with Mg2+/Ca2+ for 60 min (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comet assay Olive Tail Moment (OTM) after incubation of sperm with 10 mM of Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or 10 mM Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min) in non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between incubation times within non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples. Comparisons between non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples, or between ions (Mn2+/Ca2+ vs. Mg2+/Ca2+) are not depicted

Table 2 Olive Tail Moment (OTM) after incubation with 10 mM Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or 10 mM Mg2+Ca2+ (B) for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min), in non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples
Fig. 4
figure 4

Comet assay Olive Tail Moment (OTM) after incubation of sperm with 10 mM of Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or 10 mM Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min), in non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples. (*) indicates significant differences between non-permeabilized (−TX) and permeabilized (+TX) samples (P ≤ 0.05)

Incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ triggers the SCF mechanism in ejaculated sperm in vitro

After confirming that incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ induces DNA breaks, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was run to determine the sizes of the resulting fragments. Noticeably, incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ increased (P < 0.05) the number of DNA fragments ranging between 33 and 194 Kb, a size that would be compatible with the DNA condensed into one to four toroids (Fig. 5). This would suggest that Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ trigger SCF in ejaculated pig sperm in vitro, in a similar fashion to that observed before in epididymal and vas deferens mouse sperm in vivo [29].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Analysis of Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis DNA (PGFE) intensity. Three types of DNA fragments differing in size were identified: (i) DNA fragments > 194 Kb in length, compatible to mostly intact DNA (i.e., where SCF did not occur); (ii) DNA fragments ranging between 33 and 194 Kb in length, compatible to DNA packed into one to four toroids; and (iii) DNA fragments > 33 kb, compatible to sizes smaller than one toroid. (*) indicates significant differences between the control and treatments (P ≤ 0.05)

Mn2+/Ca2+ impairs sperm motility in a dose-dependent manner, whereas Mg2+/Ca2+ only has an effect at high concentrations

In addition to sperm DNA integrity, the effects of Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ on sperm motility, agglutination, viability and levels of total ROS and superoxides were also examined. In the case of sperm motility, and as shown in Fig. 6, Mn2+/Ca2+ caused a concentration-dependent reduction of sperm motility, which was very obvious at high concentrations; in contrast, no effect of incubation time was observed (Fig. 6A; Table 3). Incubation with Mg2+/Ca2+ also induced a drastic drop of sperm motility, but only at the highest concentration (50 mM) (P < 0.05), as the other concentrations (0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM and 10 mM) did not differ from the control (Fig. 6B; Table 4) (P > 0.05).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Percentages of motile sperm after incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) at different concentrations (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM and 50 mM) and for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min). Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) at a given time point. Differences between time points within a given concentration are not shown

Table 3 Percentages of motile sperm, viable sperm, sperm with high intracellular ROS, sperm with high intracellular superoxide levels and sperm agglutination after incubation with different concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM and 50 mM) and for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min)
Table 4 Percentages of motile sperm, viable sperm, sperm with high intracellular ROS, sperm with high intracellular superoxide levels and sperm agglutination after incubation with different concentrations of Mg2+/Ca2+ (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM and 50 mM) and for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min)

Incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ has no effect on sperm viability

Neither Mn2+/Ca2+ nor Mg2+/Ca2+ were found to have a significant effect on sperm viability (P > 0.05; Fig. 7; Tables 3, 4). Yet, there was a trend for higher concentrations (Mn2+/Ca2+ 50 mM and Mg2+/Ca2+ 10 and 50 mM) and longer incubation times (60 min) to reduce the proportion of viable sperm.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Percentages of viable sperm after incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) at different concentrations (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM and 50 mM) and for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min). No significant differences between treatments at any time point were observed

SCF is not related to oxidative stress, as neither total ROS nor superoxide levels are altered following incubation of sperm with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+

Incubation of sperm with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ did not increase intracellular levels of total ROS or superoxides in sperm (Fig. 8; Tables 3, 4) (P > 0.05). The fact that ROS were not increased upon activation of SCF suggests that this mechanism does not rely upon oxidative stress.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Total ROS and superoxide levels after incubation of sperm with Mg2+/Ca2+ (A.1 and A.2) or Mn2+/Ca2+ (B.1 and B.2) at different concentrations (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM and 50 mM) and for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min). Differences between time points within a given concentration are not shown

Incubation with both Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ induces sperm agglutination

As shown in Fig. 9, and Tables 3, 4, the proportion of agglutinated sperm increased in a dose-dependent manner following incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ (P < 0.05). Conversely, there was no influence from the incubation time (P > 0.05). Remarkably, a massive sperm agglutination was observed at high concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ (10 mM and 50 mM), with the proportion of agglutination being greater than 80%.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Percentages of agglutinated sperm after incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) at different concentrations (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM and 50 mM) and for different incubation times (0 min, 2 min, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min). Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ (A) or Mg2+/Ca2+ (B) at a given time point. Differences between time points within a given concentration are not shown

Discussion

The SCF mechanism is an intrinsic process through which sperm degrade their own DNA, producing toroid-sized fragments [19, 20]. This mechanism was first described in epididymal and vas deferens mouse sperm, where not only was demonstrated to be triggered in vitro after incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ [20, 26, 28], but also in vivo, as a way to prevent the functionality of sperm chromatin after vasectomy [29]. In mouse, SCF was found to be mediated via the activation of a nuclease present in the epididymis and vas deferens sperm and a topoisomerase IIB [27, 28], after incubation with epididymal or vas deferens fluids supplemented with Mn2+. It remained, notwithstanding, unknown if SCF can be triggered in vitro in ejaculated sperm and, if so, whether the mechanism identified in mouse differs from that occurring in other mammalian species, which is why the pig was chosen as a model herein.

The present study demonstrates, for the first time, that the SCF mechanism can also be elicited in ejaculated sperm in vitro after incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+, with the size of fragments generated by the breaks being compatible to those of the DNA condensed into toroidal structures. While this supports that this process is similar to that previously reported in epididymal and vas deferens mouse sperm, it is worth noting that, in the present work, SCF could be activated even in non-permeabilized sperm. This would suggest that, at least in ejaculated sperm, a transduction pathway including surface receptors and an intracellular machinery might be involved in this mechanism. In addition, while both Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ were able to elicit SCF, the concentration required to do so was lower in the former than in the latter. This suggests that, although the pathway triggered is not ion-specific, the affinity of the enzymes involved for Mn2+ and Mg2+ is different. Finally, in vitro activation of SCF in ejaculated sperm, despite not altering sperm viability or ROS levels, caused a reduction of sperm motility and increased agglutination. All these findings are separately discussed below.

First, and regarding DNA fragmentation, results obtained for ejaculated sperm in this study were in agreement with those previously reported in epididymal and vas deferens mouse sperm [25, 27,28,29, 32]. In that earlier research, Mn2+ at a concentration of 10 mM, with or without Ca2+, was found to trigger the SCF mechanism. Herein, it was observed that even a low concentration of Mn2+/Ca2+ was enough to activate SCF without the presence of a specific surrounding fluid; yet, the effect of this cation was dose-dependent, so that the greater the concentration of Mn2+/Ca2+ the higher the incidence of DNA breaks. In addition, the effect of Mn2+/Ca2+ was fast and very apparent as early as 2 min post-incubation, and a longer incubation period did not result in a higher incidence of sperm DNA breaks. Based on this, one can suggest that the activation of the SCF mechanism, at least in vitro, relies on the concentration of Mn2+/Ca2+ but not on the incubation period. Because such a similar approach was not taken in previous studies on mouse sperm, whether this is also the case of epididymal and vas deferens sperm remains unaddressed.

In this work, incubation with Mg2+/Ca2+ was also seen to activate SCF in ejaculated sperm, also cleaving sperm DNA at TLRs. The sensitivity to Mg2+/Ca2+, however, was lower compared to Mn2+/Ca2+. This observation agrees with previous studies where Mg2+/Ca2+ was detected to elicit SCF in epididymal permeabilized sperm when incubated together with the surrounding epididymal fluid. In mouse, an endogenous nuclease activated in response to the presence of the surrounding fluid added with divalent ions was suggested to evoke SCF; hence, that fluid was hypothesized to be essential to elicit SCF in epididymal and vas deferens sperm [17]. This, nevertheless, does not seem to be the case of ejaculated sperm, as the SCF mechanism was triggered in both permeabilized and non-permeabilized cells. This observation suggests that, at least under the conditions tested here, a transduction pathway stimulated by the activation of a cell-surface receptor that relies upon the intracellular sperm machinery is required for the cleavage of sperm DNA. This does not exclude that the final effector could be an endogenous nuclease, as earlier research reported that such an enzyme could have a vital function in the degradation of internalized exogenous DNA [33]. It is well known that DNAse I enzymes require divalent cations to activate. Interestingly, the separate enzyme subtypes differ on whether they use Mg2+ or Mn2+ as cofactors [34,35,36], and these divalent ions exhibit disparities in how the DNA is cleaved. Conversely, monovalent ions such as K+ or Na+ inhibit the generation of DNA breaks [37]. Related to this, it is worth noting that, in the experiments conducted in the current study, concentration of monovalent ions was the same in all treatments. In addition to the activity of an endogenous nuclease, one should not discard the participation of topoisomerase IIB, as previous investigations indicated that this enzyme is located near to TLRs and it is also involved in cleaving DNA into loop-sized fragments of about 50 Kb [19, 20, 25, 27, 28].

Regardless of whether endogenous DNAse I, topoisomerase IIB or both enzymes are involved in the SCF mechanism, incubation of ejaculated sperm with Mg2+/Ca2+ or Mn2+/Ca2+ resulted in an increase of DNA fragments sized between 33 and 194 Kb. Both divalent cations, therefore, appear to switch on a similar mechanism, which leads to the cleavage of DNA at TLRs [19, 20]. As mentioned in the Introduction, the most accepted model of sperm chromatin organization establishes that TLRs are associated to histones rather than to protamines [19, 20]. Thus, in these regions, the DNA is more exposed to nuclease activity and, consequently, more susceptible to become cleaved [7, 17, 24]. The fact that inducing SCF with Mg2+/Ca2+ or Mn2+/Ca2+ did not result in an increase in ROS levels supports that, in this case, a non-oxidative mechanism intervenes in the generation of DNA breaks. Indeed, if an oxidative mechanism underlay the activation of SCF, ROS would also cause single-stranded breaks both in protamine-condensed (toroidal structures) and histones-condensed (TLR) regions, thus producing more extensive DNA damage with lower-sized fragments. The results obtained in the current study are therefore compatible with a non-oxidative mechanism, which could be part of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in sperm [38], designated by some authors as ‘spermptosis’ [39], as DNA fragmentation is one of the features of apoptosis in somatic cells [40,41,42,43]. Although previous studies evaluating sperm quality in vitro reported that other apoptotic-like changes are likely to appear together with DNA fragmentation [44, 45], whether this also occurs in ejaculated sperm in vivo has not been addressed. Interestingly, Ribas-Maynou et al. [29] identified that an endogenous nuclease in vasectomized mice is active, suggesting that, in vivo, this enzyme promotes the cleavage of DNA thus rendering it unable to lead to a viable embryo when epididymal storage is excessive. Related to this, it is worth bearing in mind that sperm DNA integrity plays a crucial role during embryo development because, as demonstrated in different species [46,47,48,49], it is correlated to embryo development outcomes [46, 50]. Still in agreement with these findings, sperm having undergone SCF are no longer capable of supporting embryonic development when injected into oocytes [27]. All these data point to a limited capability of oocytes to repair paternal DNA breaks, especially those coming from SCF, which drives early embryo development failure and prevents the paternal DNA damage to be passed on the offspring [51].

While earlier research in mice demonstrated that incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ activates the SCF mechanism in epididymal and vas deferens sperm, the effects of this treatment on sperm function and survival were not previously interrogated. In the present work, neither sperm viability nor ROS generation were affected by incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+. In mammals, sperm DNA fragmentation is usually correlated with oxidative stress, and ROS is understood to be the main source of DNA damage [52,53,54,55]. The fact that, even when SCF was induced with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+, ROS levels were low supports that an enzymatic, non-oxidative mechanism would be activated in this case. On the other hand, and in spite of the lack of effect on sperm viability and ROS levels, incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ decreased motility and increased agglutination. This impact was dose-dependent and was particularly obvious at high concentrations. Previous investigations observed that high Mn2+ concentrations in seminal plasma are detrimental to sperm motility [56]. Yet, as the inclusion of 200 μM Mn2+ was suggested to exert a protective function during sperm cryopreservation [57], and because in the present study low Mn2+/Ca2+ concentrations were found to activate SCF, further research should address whether the addition of Mn2+ to cryopreservation media can be deleterious for sperm DNA integrity or embryo development [26, 32]. Moreover, the observed increase in sperm agglutination could be attributed to sperm plasma membrane destabilization caused by the interaction between the positive charge of Mn2+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ cations and the negatively charged plasma membrane. Nonetheless, as no effect on the assessment of sperm viability, which evaluates plasma membrane integrity, was observed, more investigations are needed to understand why incubation with Mg2+/Ca2+ or Mn2+/Ca2+ leads to sperm agglutination, especially at high concentrations.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrated, for the first time, that Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ are able to induce SCF in ejaculated sperm in vitro. As a result, DNA is cleaved at the TLRs, generating fragments with a length similar to the DNA condensed into toroidal structures, sperm become agglutinated and total motility decreases. The comparison between permeabilized and non-permeabilized sperm suggested that triggering of SCF is related to intracellular components, and flow cytometry data supported that it is independent from oxidative stress. Further research into how the DNA breaks induced by SCF influence fertilization and embryo development is warranted.

Materials and methods

Animals and samples

All ejaculates were provided by a local pig farm (Grup Gepork S.L., Masies de Roda, Spain), which follows the ISO certification (ISO-9001:2008) in the production of doses. The Centre follows all the regulations concerning the production and selling of seminal doses (Directive 2010/63/EU; Animal Welfare Law issued by the Regional Government of Catalonia, Spain; and the regulation on Health and Biosafety issued by the Department of Agriculture, Livestock, Food and Fisheries, Regional Government of Catalonia, Spain). As authors did not manipulate any animal but samples were rather provided by the farm, no permission from the local ethics committee was needed.

All seminal samples intended to the experiments defined below came from healthy and sexually mature Pietrain boars (1–3 years old). Ejaculates were collected with the standard hand-gloved method for this species. Immediately after collection, samples were diluted to a final concentration of 33 × 106 sperm/mL in a commercial extender (Vitasem LD, Magapor S.L.; Zaragoza, Spain) and transported at 17 °C to the laboratory.

Experimental design

Different experiments were designed to test whether the SCF mechanism operates in ejaculated sperm, and to elucidate if it may be triggered in vitro upon incubation with different ions in a dose-dependent manner. In the first and second experiments, whether the activation of the SCF mechanism increases the incidence of DSBs and if these DSBs are located in the TLRs was investigated. The third experiment determined if evoking SCF with Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ has any repercussion on other sperm functional variables, such as motility, viability, agglutination and intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species.

Experiment 1: Dose-dependent effect of Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ on the generation of DNA breaks

To assess the generation of DNA breaks after exposure to Mn2+ and Mg2+ ions, the first experiment incubated ejaculated sperm with these ions, at different concentrations and for different times. In addition, these experiments were conducted in permeabilized and non-permeabilized samples with the aim to address if the SCF mechanism is triggered outside the cell or involves the intracellular machinery. Briefly, three semen doses, each from a separate boar (sperm concentration: 33 × 106 sperm/mL), were pooled and centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min at room temperature to remove preservation medium. Sperm were resuspended in phosphate buffered saline buffer (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH = 7.5). In the case of permeabilized samples, they were further incubated with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 10 min on ice. Following this, every sample was split into two aliquots (one for Mn2+/Ca2+ and the other for Mg2+/Ca2+), and each of these aliquots was in turn divided into 10 tubes of equal volume (five to assess the effects of the dose, and five to determine those of the incubation time). To evaluate the dose–response, samples were incubated with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ at 0 mM [Control], 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM or 50 mM (prepared with the appropriate volumes of MnCl2, MgCl2 and CaCl2, all at 0.5 M), for 10 min at 37 °C. To evaluate the time-response, samples were incubated with 10 mM Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ at 37 °C for 0 min (Control), 2 min, 10 min, 30 min or 60 min. After incubation, the incidence of DNA breaks was determined through the Comet assay.

Experiment 2: Assessment of the size of the DNA fragments generated by Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ incubations

Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) was run to identify the size of the DNA fragments generated after inducing SCF through incubation with Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+. Based on the results of experiment 1, 7 mL of non-permeabilized ejaculated sperm from three boars (concentration: 33 × 106 sperm/mL) were centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min at room temperature to remove preservation medium. Then, samples were resuspended in PBS buffer and incubated with 10 mM Mn2+/Ca2+ or 10 mM Mg2+/Ca2+ (prepared with the appropriate volumes of MnCl2, MgCl2 and CaCl2, all at 0.5 M) at 37 °C for 30 min. Samples were subsequently subjected to PFGE, as described below, in order to assess the size of the resulting DNA fragments. Negative controls consisted of non-treated sperm in PBS without Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ incubated at 37 °C for 30 min.

Experiment 3: Impact of Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ dose and/or incubation time treatments on sperm function and survival

How incubation with different doses of Mn2+/Ca2+ and Mg2+/Ca2+ and for different periods affects sperm function and survival was evaluated on the basis of sperm motility with Computer Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA); sperm agglutination under a phase-contrast microscope; and sperm viability, and levels of total ROS and superoxides through flow cytometry. For all treatments, 50 mL of each sample (N = 3, from three separate boars) were centrifuged at 600 g and room temperature for 10 min to remove the preservation medium. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in 50 mL of PBS previously tempered at 37 °C. Then, sperm diluted in PBS were distributed in 1-mL aliquots according to the number of treatments and incubation times tested. Following this, the corresponding Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ treatments were added to sperm samples. To evaluate the dose- and incubation time-response, sperm samples were incubated with different concentrations of Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+ (Control, 0.1 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM and 50 mM, prepared with the appropriate volumes of MnCl2, MgCl2 and CaCl2, all at 0.5 M) for different incubation times (2 min, 10 min, 30 min and 60 min) at 37 °C. Once done, flow cytometry and CASA analysis were conducted to assess the aforementioned variables.

Comet assay

The global incidence of sperm DNA breaks was determined with the Comet assay. The protocol used included a previous step for complete chromatin decondensation, which is known to be essential to accurately evaluate DNA fragmentation in pig sperm [58]. First, samples were diluted to 5 × 105 sperm/mL in PBS and mixed 1:2 (v:v) with prewarmed (37 °C) low melting point (LMP) agarose, achieving a final agarose concentration of 0.66% (w:v). Then, 6.5 µL of the mixture was placed onto an agarose-treated slide, which contained a layer of 1% LMP agarose (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA); the drop was covered with an 8-mm diameter round coverslip. After allowing the agarose-sample mixture to solidify for 5 min on the top of a metal cold plate at 4 °C, the coverslip was gently removed. Subsequently, the slide was incubated in three lysis solutions: (1) 0.8 M Tris–HCl, 0.8 M DTT and 1% SDS (pH = 7.5) for 30 min; (2) 0.8 M Tris–HCl, 0.8 M DTT and 1% SDS (pH = 7.5) for 30 min; and (3) 0.4 M Tris–HCl, 0.4 M DTT, 50 mM EDTA, 2 M NaCl, 1% Tween20 and 100 µg/mL Proteinase K (pH = 7.5) for 180 min. Then, DNA was denatured through incubation in an alkaline solution (0.03 M NaOH, 1 M NaCl, pH = 13) at 4 °C for 5 min. Slides were electrophoresed at 1 V/cm for 4 min in an alkaline buffer (0.03 M NaOH, pH = 13). After electrophoresis, samples were incubated in a neutralization solution (0.4 M Tris–HCl, pH = 7.5) for 5 min, and slides were subsequently dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series (70%, 90% and 100% ethanol; 2 min per step). Samples were dried in horizontal position and stored until staining and analysis. For staining, slides were submerged into a solution containing 5 µL of 1 × SYTOX Orange (Invitrogen; Waltham, MA, USA) in 50 mL of distilled water for 15 min.

The prepared Comet samples were visualized under an epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss Imager Z1, Carl Zeiss AG; Oberkochen, Germany) and captured using the Axiovision 4.6 software (Carl Zeiss AG) at a resolution of 1388 × 1040 pixels. At least 100 sperm cells per sample were captured at 100 × magnification, adjusting the exposure time in each capture to avoid overexposure of Comet heads or Comet tails. The quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity was performed using the automatic function of the CometScore v2.0 software (Rexhoover, www.rexhoover.com). After reviewing the analysis, overlapping comets or signals that did not correspond to comets were eliminated. A minimum of 50 analyzable comets was set as the lowest limit to establish a mean DNA damage intensity, and more pictures were captured and analyzed when this figure was not reached. Data files including Comet head intensity (arbitrary units (AU)), tail intensity (AU), tail length (pixels) and percentage of DNA in the tail (Tail DNA) were exported from CometScore as.csv. To quantify the amount of DNA breaks, the Olive Tail Moment (OTM) was used as a standard parameter and calculated as OTM = (Tail mean intensity − Head mean intensity) × Tail DNA/100.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

After each treatment, sperm concentration was adjusted to 400 × 106 sperm/mL through centrifugation at 600 g for 5 min and resuspension in PBS. Following this, samples were mixed 1:1 (v:v) with 2% LMP agarose (Thermo Fisher Scientific) previously melted at 38 °C, then poured onto BioRad plug molds (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA, USA) and finally cooled at 4 °C for 15 min. Thereafter, plugs were unmolded, placed in 2 mL of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM DTT, 2% SDS and 20 mg/mL proteinase K; pH = 8.0), and incubated at 53 °C for 60 min. After incubation, plugs were washed three times in TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA; pH = 8).

A half of each plug was cut-off and loaded onto a well of 1% PFGE agarose gel (Pulsed-Field Certified Agarose BioRad; Hercules, CA, USA). A slice of the Low Range PFG DNA Marker (New England Biolabs; Ipswich, MA, USA), which was commercially embedded in agarose, was also loaded. The agarose gel with the standard casting platform frame was placed into a contour-clamped homogeneous electric field apparatus (Bio-Rad CHEF DRIII system) in 0.5 × TBE buffer (Tris–borate 50 mM, EDTA 0.1 mM) at 14 °C. Samples were run at 4 V/cm for 27.1 h with a rotation (angle) of 120° and a pulse change ramp from 6.7 to 33.7 s. Finally, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized and photographed under ultraviolet light using the GelDoc System (BioRad; Hercules, CA, USA).

For each sample, the intensity of the DNA smear in the gel was quantified employing the Image Studio Lite (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). The DNA ladder was utilized to distinguish the size of DNA fragments as follows: (i) < 33 Kb, corresponding to DNA fragments shorter than a toroid; (ii) between 33 and 194 Kb, corresponding to DNA fragments with sizes compatible with one or multiple toroids; (iii) and > 194 Kb, corresponding to mostly intact DNA (i.e., where SCF did not induce DSBs).

Sperm motility

Sperm motility was assessed through a CASA system (Integrates Sperm Analysis System, ISAS V1.0; Proiser S.L.; Valencia, Spain) coupled to an Olympus BX41 microscope (Olympus; Tokyo, Japan) with a negative phase contrast field at 100 × (Olympus 10 × 0.30 PLAN objective, Olympus). Semen samples were incubated at 38 °C for 15 min, and 3 µL of each sample was placed into a pre-warmed 20-μm Leja chamber slide (Leja Products BV; Nieuw-Vennep, The Netherlands). Two technical replicates were examined, evaluating 1000 sperm per replicate. Total motility was recorded assuming that a sperm cell was motile when its average path velocity (VAP) was ≥ 10 μm/s.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry analysis were performed using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), equipped with red, blue and violet lasers (637, 488 and 405 nm). First, sperm concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 sperm/mL in PBS. Two replicates per sample were examined in each test and three sperm parameters were evaluated: sperm viability, total ROS and superoxides. For this purpose, SYBR-14, 2′7′-dichlorodihydrofuorescein (H2DCFDA) and Hydroethidine (HE) fluorochromes were combined with Propidium Iodide (PI) or YO-PRO-1. All fluorochromes were excited with the 488 nm laser. The fluorescence emitted by SYBR-14, YO-PRO-1 and H2DCFDA was detected with the FITC channel (525/40), that emitted by HE was collected through the PE channel (585/42), and the fluorescence emitted by PI was detected through the PC5.5 channel (690/50). All fluorochromes were purchased from ThermoFisher (Waltham, MA, USA). Analysis of flow cytometry dot-plots was conducted through the CytExpert Software (Beckman Coulter; Fullerton, CA, USA), and the device was calibrated daily as recommended by the manufacturer.

Sperm viability

Sperm viability was determined by staining samples with SYBR-14 (final concentration of 32 nmol/L) and PI (final concentration of 7.5 μmol/L) at 38 °C in the dark for 15 min. The percentages of viable (SYBR-14+/PI) and non-viable sperm (SYBR-14/PI+ and SYBR-14+/PI+) were recorded and used for subsequent statistical analyses.

Total ROS levels (H 2 DCFDA)

Total ROS levels in sperm were detected through staining with H2DCFDA (final concentration of 100 μmol/L), a cell-permeant compound that is oxidized into DCF+ in the presence of ROS, and PI (final concentration of 5.6 μmol/L) at 38 °C in the dark for 20 min. After analysis, four subpopulations were identified and recorded: viable sperm with low levels of ROS (DCF/PI); viable sperm with high levels of ROS (DCF+/PI); non-viable sperm with low levels of ROS (DCF/PI+); and non-viable sperm with high levels of ROS (DCF+/PI+).

Superoxide levels (HE)

Intracellular superoxide levels (O2•−) were determined after incubation of samples with hydroethidine (HE) (final concentration of 5 µmol/L), an element that is oxidized into E+ in the presence of O2•−, and YO-PRO-1 (final concentration of 31.2 nmol/L) for 20 min at 38 °C in the dark. The fluorescence emitted by E+ was detected with the FITC channel and the one emitted by YO-PRO-1 was collected through the PE channel. Spill-over into these two channels was compensated (2.24% and 7.5%, respectively). Four separate subpopulations were identified and recorded: viable sperm with low levels of superoxides (E/YO-PRO-1); viable sperm with high levels of superoxides (E+/YO-PRO-1); non-viable sperm with low levels of superoxides (E/YO-PRO-1+); and non-viable sperm with high levels of superoxides (E+/YO-PRO-1+).

Sperm agglutination

Because sperm became agglutinated after incubation with some treatments, the degree of agglutination was also determined in this study. For this purpose, and following the protocol described by Harayama et al. [59], 250 sperm cells per sample were counted under a phase-contrast microscope at 100 × magnification. Each sperm cell was classified as either agglutinated or non-agglutinated. Two technical replicates per sample were examined.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS for Windows version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 8 (La Jolla, CA, USA). First, normal distribution and homogeneity of variances were examined using Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests. As parametric assumptions could not be assumed for the data obtained and because samples were paired (repeated measures), a non-parametric two-way ANOVA (Scheirer-Ray-Hare Test) was run. Factors were concentration of Mn2+/Ca2+ or Mg2+/Ca2+, and incubation time. Pair-wise comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon test. A P-value ≤ 0.05 was taken as the limit to consider values statistically significant.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

−TX:

Non-permeabilized samples

+TX:

Permeabilized samples

AU:

Arbitrary units

Ca2+ :

Calcium

CASA:

Computer assisted sperm analysis

DSB:

Double-stranded DNA breaks

H2DCFDA:

2′7′-Dichlorodihydrofuorescein

HE:

Hydroethidine

LMP:

Low melting point

Mg2+ :

Magnesium

Mn2+ :

Manganese

O2 •− :

Superoxide ion

OTM:

Olive tail moment

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PFGE:

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis

PI:

Propidium iodide

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SCF:

Sperm chromatin fragmentation

TLRs:

Toroid-linker regions

VAP:

Average path velocity

References

  1. Simon L, Emery B, Carrell DT. Sperm DNA fragmentation: consequences for reproduction. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1166:87–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Busnelli A, Garolla A, Di Credico E, D'Ippolito S, Merola AM, Milardi D, Pontecorvi A, Scambia G, Di Simone N. Sperm DNA fragmentation and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: results from a multicenter case–control study. Andrology. 2023.

  3. Vallet-Buisan M, Mecca R, Jones C, Coward K, Yeste M. Contribution of semen to early embryo development: fertilization and beyond. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29(4):395–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ribas-Maynou J, Novo S, Torres M, Salas-Huetos A, Rovira S, Antich M, Yeste M. Sperm DNA integrity does play a crucial role for embryo development after ICSI, notably when good-quality oocytes from young donors are used. Biol Res. 2022;55(1):41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeqiraj A, Beadini S, Beadini N, Aliu H, Gashi Z, Elezaj S, Bexheti S, Shabani A. Male infertility and sperm DNA fragmentation. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(8):1342–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Santi D, Spaggiari G, Simoni M. Sperm DNA fragmentation index as a promising predictive tool for male infertility diagnosis and treatment management—meta-analyses. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(3):315–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ribas-Maynou J, Benet J. Single and double strand sperm DNA damage: different reproductive effects on male fertility. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(2):105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bibi R, Jahan S, Razak S, Hammadeh ME, Almajwal A, Amor H. Protamines and DNA integrity as a biomarkers of sperm quality and assisted conception outcome. Andrologia. 2022;54(6): e14418.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal A, Cannarella R, Saleh R, Harraz AM, Kandil H, Salvio G, Boitrelle F, Kuroda S, Farkouh A, Rambhatla A, Zini A, Colpi G, Gül M, Kavoussi P, Hamoda TAA, Ko E, Calik G, Toprak T, Pinggera GM, Park HJ, Ghayda RA, Minhas S, Busetto GM, Bakırcıoğlu ME, Kadioglu A, Chung E, Russo GI, Calogero AE, Ambar RF, Jayasena CN, Shah R. Impact of antioxidant therapy on natural pregnancy outcomes and semen parameters in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Mens Health. 2023;41(1):14–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bahmyari R, Zare M, Sharma R, Agarwal A, Halvaei I. The efficacy of antioxidants in sperm parameters and production of reactive oxygen species levels during the freeze-thaw process: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrologia. 2020;52(3): e13514.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marushige K, Marushige Y, Wong TK. Complete displacement of somatic histones during transformation of spermatid chromatin: a model experiment. Biochemistry. 1976;15(10):2047–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sillaste G, Kaplinski L, Meier R, Jaakma Ü, Eriste E, Salumets A. A novel hypothesis for histone-to-protamine transition in Bos taurus spermatozoa. Reproduction. 2017;153:241–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliva R. Protamines and male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:417–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mudrak O, Tomilin N, Zalensky A. Chromosome architecture in the decondensing human sperm nucleus. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:4541–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hud NV, Downing KH, Balhorn R. A constant radius of curvature model for the organization of DNA in toroidal condensates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(8):3581–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brewer LR, Corzett M, Balhorn R. Protamine-induced condensation and decondensation of the same DNA molecule. Science. 1999;286(5437):120–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sotolongo B, Lino E, Ward WS. Ability of hamster spermatozoa to digest their own DNA. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(6):2029–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aoki VW, Carrell DT. Human protamines and the developing spermatid: their structure, function, expression and relationship with male infertility. Asian J Androl. 2003;5:315–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boaz SM, Dominguez K, Shaman JA, Ward WS. Mouse spermatozoa contain a nuclease that is activated by pretreatment with EGTA and subsequent calcium incubation. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103:1636–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sotolongo B, Huang TT, Isenberger E, Ward WS. An endogenous nuclease in hamster, mouse, and human spermatozoa cleaves DNA into loop-sized fragments. J Androl. 2005;26(2):272–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ward WS. Function of sperm chromatin structural elements in fertilization and development. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:30–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ribas-Maynou J, García-Peiró A, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Navarro J, Benet J. Alkaline and neutral Comet assay profiles of sperm DNA damage in clinical groups. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):652–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaman JA, Yamauchi Y, Ward WS. The sperm nuclear matrix is required for paternal DNA replication. J Cell Biochem. 2007;102(3):680–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Villani P, Eleuteri P, Grollino MG, Rescia M, Altavista P, Spanò M, Pacchierotti F, Cordelli E. Sperm DNA fragmentation induced by DNAse I and hydrogen peroxide: an in vitro comparative study among different mammalian species. Reproduction. 2010;140(3):445–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ribas-Maynou J, Gawecka JE, Benet J, Ward WS. Double-stranded DNA breaks hidden in the neutral Comet assay suggest a role of the sperm nuclear matrix in DNA integrity maintenance. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20:330–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gawecka JE, Marh J, Ortega M, Yamauchi Y, Ward MA, Ward WS. Mouse zygotes respond to severe sperm DNA damage by delaying paternal DNA replication and embryonic development. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2): e56385.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamauchi Y, Shaman JA, Ward WS. Topoisomerase II-mediated breaks in spermatozoa cause the specific degradation of paternal DNA in fertilized oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2007;76(4):666–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaman JA, Prisztoka R, Ward WS. Topoisomerase IIB and an extracellular nuclease interact to digest sperm DNA in an apoptotic-like manner. Biol Reprod. 2006;75:741–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ribas-Maynou J, Nguyen H, Valle R, Wu H, Yeste M, Ward WS. Sperm degradation after vasectomy follows a sperm chromatin fragmentation-dependent mechanism causing DNA breaks in the toroid linker regions. Mol Hum Reprod. 2022;29(9):gaac029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ribas-Maynou J, Yeste M, Salas-Huetos A. The relationship between sperm oxidative stress alterations and IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review from nonhuman mammals. Biology (Basel). 2020;9:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aitken RJ, Drevet JR. The importance of oxidative stress in determining the functionality of mammalian spermatozoa: a two-edged sword. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(2):111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yamauchi Y, Shaman JA, Boaz SM, Ward WS. Paternal pronuclear DNA degradation is functionally linked to DNA replication in mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2007;77(3):407–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maione B, Pittoggi C, Achene L, Lorenzini R, Spadafora C. Activation of endogenous nucleases in mature sperm cells upon interaction with exogenous DNA. DNA Cell Biol. 1997;16:1087–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dupureur CM. Roles of metal ions in nucleases. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2008;12(2):250–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pan CQ, Ulmer JS, Herzka A, Lazarus RA. Mutational analysis of human DNase I at the DNA binding interface: implications for DNA recognition, catalysis, and metal ion dependence. Protein Sci. 1998;7(3):628–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Guéroult M, Picot D, Abi-Ghanem J, Hartmann B, Baaden M. How cations can assist DNase I in DNA binding and hydrolysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(11): e1001000.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Melgar E, Goldthwait D. Deoxyribonucleic acid nucleases. II The effects of metals on the mechanism of action of deoxyribonuclease I. J Biol Chem. 1968;243(17):4409–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gorczyca W, Traganos F, Jesionowska H, Darzynkiewicz Z. Presence of DNA strand breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1993;207:202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ortega-Ferrusola C, Anel-López L, Martín-Muñoz P, Ortíz-Rodríguez JM, Gil MC, Alvarez M, de Paz P, Ezquerra LJ, Masot AJ, Redondo E, Anel L, Peña FJ. Computational flow cytometry reveals that cryopreservation induces spermptosis but subpopulations of spermatozoa may experience capacitation-like changes. Reproduction. 2017;153(3):293–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wyllie AH, Kerr JF, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int Rev Cytol. 1980;68:251–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Halenbeck R, MacDonald H, Roulston A, Chen TT, Conroy L, Williams LT. CPAN, a human nuclease regulated by the caspase-sensitive inhibitor DFF45. Curr Biol. 1998;8(9):537–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Enari M, Sakahira H, Yokoyama H, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Nagata S. A caspase-activated DNase that degrades DNA during apoptosis, and its inhibitor ICAD. Nature. 1998;391(6662):43–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu X, Li P, Widlak P, Zou H, Luo X, Garrard WT, Wang X. The 40-kDa subunit of DNA fragmentation factor induces DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation during apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(15):8461–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gandini L, Lombardo F, Paoli D, Caponecchia L, Familiari G, Verlengia C, Dondero F, Lenzi A. Study of apoptotic DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(4):830–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharbatoghli M, Valojerdi MR, Amanlou M, Khosravi F, Jafar-abadi MA. Relationship of sperm DNA fragmentation, apoptosis and dysfunction of mitochondrial membrane potential with semen parameters and ART outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(5):1315–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mateo-Otero Y, Llavanera M, Recuero S, Delgado-Bermúdez A, Barranco I, Ribas-Maynou J, Yeste M. Sperm DNA damage compromises embryo development, but not oocyte fertilisation in pigs. Biol Res. 2022;55(1):15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng WW, Song G, Wang QL, Liu SW, Zhu XL, Deng SM, Zhong A, Tan YM, Tan Y. Sperm DNA damage has a negative effect on early embryonic development following in vitro fertilization. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(1):75–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Simon L, Murphy K, Shamsi MB, Liu L, Emery B, Aston KI, Hotaling J, Carrell DT. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(11):2402–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sedó CA, Bilinski M, Lorenzi D, Uriondo H, Noblía F, Longobucco V, Lagar EV, Nodar F. Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on embryo development: clinical and biological aspects. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(4):343–50.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ribas-Maynou J, Delgado-Bermúdez A, Mateo-Otero Y, Viñolas E, Hidalgo CO, Ward WS, Yeste M. Determination of double- and single-stranded DNA breaks in bovine sperm is predictive of their fertilizing capacity. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2022;13(1):105.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. J Exp Zool. 1999;284:696–704.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ozmen B, Caglar G, Koster F, Schopper B, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. Relationship between sperm DNA damage, induced acrosome reaction and viability in ICSI patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:208–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zandieh Z, Vatannejad A, Doosti M, Zabihzadeh S, Haddadi M, Bajelan L, Rashidi B, Amanpour S. Comparing reactive oxygen species and DNA fragmentation in semen samples of unexplained infertile and healthy fertile men. Ir J Med Sci. 2018;187(3):657–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Muratori M, Pellegrino G, Mangone G, Azzari C, Lotti F, Tarozzi N, Boni L, Borini A, Maggi M, Baldi E. DNA fragmentation in viable and non-viable spermatozoa discriminates fertile and subfertile subjects with similar accuracy. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1341.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Samplaski MK, Dimitromanolakis A, Lo KC, Grober ED, Mullen B, Garbens A, Jarvi KA. The relationship between sperm viability and DNA fragmentation rates. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Li P, Zhong Y, Jiang X, Wang C, Zuo Z, Sha A. Seminal plasma metals concentration with respect to semen quality. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012;148(1):1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cheema RS, Bansal AK, Bilaspuri GS. Manganese provides antioxidant protection for sperm cryopreservation that may offer new consideration for clinical fertility. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2009;2(3):152–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ribas-Maynou J, Delgado-Bermúdez A, Garcia-Bonavila E, Pinart E, Yeste M, Bonet S. Complete chromatin decondensation of pig sperm is required to analyze sperm DNA breaks with the comet assay. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 675973.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Harayama H, Miyano T, Miyake M, Kusunoki H, Kato S. Identification of anti-agglutinin for spermatozoa in epididymal boar plasma. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;37(4):436–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the support of Marc Llavanera and Ariadna Delgado-Bermúdez.

Funding

The present study was funded by the Regional Government of Catalonia, Spain (2021-SGR-00900), the European Commission (H2020 Research and Innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 801342; Tecniospring INDUSTRY, TECSPR-19-1-0003), La Marató de TV3 Foundation (Grant: 214/857-202039), and the Catalan Institution of Advanced Studies (ICREA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JR-M and MY devised experiments; EV-V, FG, YM-O and JR-M conducted experimental procedures; EV-V and JR-M analyzed data, wrote the Manuscript and prepared figures and tables; MY and SB revised and edited the Manuscript. All authors approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Yeste.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No animal was manipulated by authors, as semen samples were provided by a local farm. No permission from the local ethics committee was therefore needed.

Consent of publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viñolas-Vergés, E., Yeste, M., Garriga, F. et al. An intracellular, non-oxidative factor activates in vitro chromatin fragmentation in pig sperm. Biol Res 56, 53 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40659-023-00467-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40659-023-00467-w

Keywords